Category:Books
Genre: Religion & Spirituality
Author:Sam Harris
What surprised me most about this book is that it has something equally important to say to atheists, agnostics, christians, muslims, buddhists, hindus...just about everyone really. And that important thing is this: Religion and Faith should be held up to scrutiny, and should not be set apart as unquestionable.

Of course, most of us believe this anyway, and most of us are all too eager to hold up OTHER people's faith/religion to scrutiny. But we have a harder time holding our own up to such rigorous testing.

Much of this book examines the muslim faith, and shows how unquestioning adherence to it can lead to such tragic events as the September 11 terrorist attacks. Harris doesn't stop at the muslims, though. He goes on to show what can happen when unquestioning adherence to the christian faith can lead to it's own atrocities.

I think the thing I liked most about this book is that it doesn't require a reader to "convert" to atheism to appreciate it. While Harris himself is an avowed atheist, his points are well taken from any angle.

This is one of those books I think we should all read to help sharpen our minds and see the insanity inherent in extreme fundamentalism.


madameditor wrote on Apr 16
Interesting...I can certainly see the usefulness--the necessity, really--of scrutinizing one's religion. And I agree that most people don't want to hold a microscope up to their own beliefs. But what troubles me is that you also say faith should be scrutinized. I'm not so sure. Because faith doesn't have to make sense. In fact, I think a valid definition of faith would be holding something to be true in spite of evidence to the contrary.
jamtown wrote on Apr 16
But what troubles me is that you also say faith should be scrutinized. I'm not so sure. Because faith doesn't have to make sense. In fact, I think a valid definition of faith would be holding something to be true in spite of evidence to the contrary.
In spite of evidence to the contrary? Or in spite of no evidence at all? When your faith holds that Jesus came to save the human race through grace, and all we have to do is accept it, then such faith is harmless and often beneficial. But when faith holds that God wants you to fly a couple of planes into the world trade centers, then I think it would have been better for the world if the holders of such faith thought that maybe they should require some evidence. (Lest it appear that I am picking on just one religion, Google Fred Phelps or Westboro Baptist Church for examples of Christians whose faith could use a does of scrutiny.) The book mentioned above goes into some detail about how dangereous people can be when they truly believe something that has no evidence.

And think about it. If we hold something to be true in spite of evidence to the contrary in any other aspect of our lives, people would consider us to be insane (and they'd be right). So why is it that holding something to be true in spite of evidence to the contrary when it comes to faith is not only NOT considered insane, but considered a virtue?

I guess it's a question of line drawing, and none of us are quite sure where to draw it.

Thanks for posting, by the way. I've been enjoying your blog so far and I'm glad you've become part of Multiply.
madameditor wrote on Apr 16
Thanks for the kind thought. And please understand that I didn't mean to criticize or even argue; just thinking 'out loud,' really. I guess what I was thinking about when I said "evidence to the contrary" was in a situation like creation v. evolution. There appears to be some evidence to support both (tho' I believe creationism, I have to concede that evolutionists do have some support for their argument). But your point is well taken.
jamtown wrote on Apr 17
Hey, don't worry. I didn't take it as criticism at all, just conversation (and some good conversation at that).

tandt2 wrote on Apr 19
ReviewReviewReviewReview
As not a Science person, I also did not follow the science perfectly. I guess it is a form of "faith" that I trust that he has researched his science. Just like I imagine I have 'faith" people have gone to the moon, or any number of other things that I don't know, but take to be self-evident. Dawkins has taken upon himself to launch the world into a much more intellectual realm with his points. Perhaps a little high-minded, but still making excellent points.
tandt2 wrote on Apr 19
Ooops I reviewed the wrong book.
Add a Comment
How would you rate this book? (optional)
   

Platinum Account

This site is certified 51% GOOD by the Gematriculator' /



Self Portrait in Crayon at a Fish and Chips Shop



Self Portrait in Crayon at Montanas



Self Portrait in Crayon at Swiss Chalet



Self Portrait on a MagnaDoodle



Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting



Thanks for dropping by my site. I love that you are here and I love that you are looking at, listening to, and reading my stuff. Here are some things you should know before you start browsing around:

1. If you see something that makes you want to comment, add a reply...most pages here have the option to add your own reply to them, and sometimes an interesting discussion gets started.Come Talk To Me!



2.Video on this site is all in the DivX format.Go towww.divx.comand click where it says "Free Download" and follow the directions. When installing it, the only thing you need checked off is "Divx Codec"...Windows Media player will play the video once this is installed and you'll be able to see the video (instead of just hearing it).



3. Text inblueis clickable. It might lead to another site or it might download a song that goes with my blog somehow. So when you see text inblue, you can click on it and see where it takes you.

© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help